Forleden startet NRKs brennpunkt høstsesongen med et program om
el-allergi. La meg først si at jeg stiller meg tvilende, men ikke
totalt avvisende til el-allergi. Det er en underdrivelse på mer enn en
måte å si at vi har lite dokumentasjon om skadevirkninger.
Jeg synes dokumentaren fra Brennpunkt var lite overbevisende, den
virket dessverre tendensiøs og useriøs. Jeg sier dessverre, for vi
trenger programmer som setter fokus på problemområder og tør å ta opp
kontroversielle tema, men når de gjør det useriøst, ødelegger de
kanskje mer enn de bidrar.
See more ...
/personlig |
permanent link
| kommentér
(2)
Europaparlamentet er bekymret for helseskader av stråling - lagt inn av
Rita
- 2008/9/26 16:29:30
Europaparlamentet anerkjenner The Bioinitiativ report og forskerne bak, noe Statens strålevern ikke gjør. Så får vi lese selv og bestemme hva vi tror på......
European Parliament Recommends BioInitiative Safety Limits for Cell Phones
Belgium Created: 18 Sep 2008 University of Albany, Institute for Health and the Environment - The European Parliament has voted 522 to 16 to recommend tighter safety standards for cell phones. In light of the growing body of scientific evidence implicating cell phone use with brain tumors, the Parliament says, "The limits on exposure to electromagnetic fields [EMFs] which have been set for the general public are obsolete."
The European Parliament "is greatly concerned at the Bio-Initiative international report concerning EMFs, which summarises over 1500 studies on that topic and which points in its conclusions to the health risks posed by emissions from mobile-telephony devices such as mobile telephones, UMTS, WiFi, WiMax and Bluetooth, and also DECT landline telephones." Further, it points out the need to "address vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, newborn babies and children."
The Mid-Term Review of the European Environmental and Health Action Plan recommends 36 specific points for improving human health. It points to changes that can improve air and water quality, and reduce exposures to toxic chemicals and EMFs that have been linked to health risks.
BioInitiative author Dr. Martin Blank, Columbia University professor and researcher in bioelectromagnetics says, "Cells in the body react to EMFs as potentially harmful, just like to other environmental toxins such as heavy metals and toxic chemicals. The DNA in living cells recognizes EMFs at very low levels of exposure, and produces a biochemical stress response. The scientific evidence tells us that our safety standards are inadequate, and that we must protect ourselves from exposure to EMFs due to powerlines, cell phones and the like."
Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD and Professor at University Hospital in Orebro, Sweden who wrote on brain tumors and cell phones in the BioInitiative Report, says, "The evidence for risks from prolonged cell phone and cordless phone use is quite strong when you look at people who have used these devices for 10 years or longer, and when they are used mainly on one side of the head." At a conference in London last week, Dr. Hardell noted that exposure to children poses even greater risk than to adults, a fact of concern since so many children now regularly use cell phones.
Noting the already lowered exposure limits of some European countries the EU Parliament is now calling on the EU Council to amend Recommendation 1999/519/EC for all equipment producing emissions in the 0.1 MHz to 300 GHz frequency range. This would include cell phones as well as other wireless devices. Wireless technologies that rely on microwave radiation to send emails and voice communication are thousands of times stronger than levels reported to cause some health impacts.
Reports: Mid-Term Review of the European Environment and Health Action Plan 2004-2010, September 4, 2008
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2008-0410+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN#def_1_8
BioInitiative: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF) August 31, 2007
http://www.bioinitiative.org
- lagt inn av
Anders Christensen
- 2008/9/27 06:54:53
Europaparlamentet kan nok stemme over hva de synes er farlig, men de er og blir et politisk organ - med forbausende begrenset innflytelse og gir meg vibber av uansvarlig og populistisk vingling. De har lite med vitenskap å gjøre, og deres stemmegivning er ikke noen bevisførsel vitenskaplig sett. Rapporten fra Bio-initiative (en murstein på 610 sider) kjente jeg ikke til, men den ser mer interessant ut. Jeg tror ikke den ble nevnt i Brennpunkt - som var det programmet jeg anmeldte og fant temmelig useriøst. Hvorvidt slik stråling er farlig eller ikke er et annet spørsmål enn om Brennpunkt var seriøst og overbevisende.